For the presentation, handouts, discussion and seminar work equally applies observing gender-inclusive language use.
studies have shown (Rothmund & Scheele 2004; Irmer & Linn 2005) :
- Generic masculine leads to asymmetric referencing (for men). A footnote: "Women are co-intended in the text" caused "deprivation dynamics"
- caps-I leads to asymmetric referencing (to women)
- pair of mold and mold-pair neutralization brought symmetrical Reference of women and men
- If women are "co-intended," they should be explicitly mentioned, because the generic masculine men tend to be associated.
- Does the sex not matter neutral forms are preferable because they have a smaller "male bias" as the generic masculine.
- in gender-stereotyped contexts requires the conscious designation (eg electricians, computer scientists) to cause female associations (so as is indeed kindergarten teachers and nurses do not have to feel co-intended and will be extra hereinafter).
to read:
Klann-Delius, Gisela (2005). Language and gender. Stuttgart, Weimar: JB Metzler.
Rothmund, Jutta & Scheele, Brigitte (2004). People called model to the test. Possible solutions to the problem of gender-Sexus-type layer. In: Journal of Psychology, 212 (1), 40-54. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Irmer, Lisa Linn, Ute (2005). The representation of generic masculine person reference. A theoretical integration of previous results. In: Journal of Psychology, 213 (3), 167-175. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Klann-Delius, Gisela (2005). Language and gender. Stuttgart, Weimar: JB Metzler.
Rothmund, Jutta & Scheele, Brigitte (2004). People called model to the test. Possible solutions to the problem of gender-Sexus-type layer. In: Journal of Psychology, 212 (1), 40-54. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Irmer, Lisa Linn, Ute (2005). The representation of generic masculine person reference. A theoretical integration of previous results. In: Journal of Psychology, 213 (3), 167-175. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
0 comments:
Post a Comment